|
NEWS ADVISORY
RE: Victor McLaughlin
In-Custody Death
777 Bannock Street
November 11, 2001
February
6, 2002
Contact:
Lynn Kimbrough, 720-913-9025
The review of the
investigation of the in-custody death of Victor McLaughlin has
been concluded. The incident which lead to his death occurred
on November 11, 2001, in the parking lot of the Denver Health
Medical Center, 777 Bannock Street, Denver, Colorado. No
criminal charges are fileable against the three
“good-Samaritan” citizens, two Hospital Shared Services
security personnel, or one Denver police officer that, at
varying times, were involved in this violent confrontation
with McLaughlin.
A review of the
totality of the evidence amassed in this investigation supports
the conclusion that the violent actions of McLaughlin caused the
necessity for significant force to be used to control him. The
degree and nature of the injuries described in Dr. Henry’s
autopsy report are consistent with the force used as described
by the participants in and witnesses to this confrontation.
Three
“good-Samaritan” citizens ran to the aid of Marion McLaughlin
(McLaughlin’s mother) who was pleading for help. McLaughlin was
on top of his mother on the parking-lot pavement, and to those
who observed it, appeared to be physically assaulting her. Mrs.
McLaughlin stated to investigators that she is sure that it
looked to them (the citizens) like McLaughlin was trying to hurt
her. She stated that she was frightened and startled by his
behavior. She felt that he was not in control. She said she
was afraid he might hurt her and she was afraid she could not
help him. A woman who helped Mrs. McLaughlin after she was
freed from her son told investigators that Mrs. McLaughlin
stated that her son was acting crazy and to hide her from him.
The lengthy efforts
of the three “good-Samaritan” citizens to first free her from
McLaughlin, then subdue him, and control him until authorities
arrived was a very violent confrontation. It was the out of
control, violent, and continuously resistant conduct of
McLaughlin that necessitated the degree of force they used.
Witnesses described McLaughlin as having the woman (Mrs.
McLaughlin) in a headlock, pulling her hair, and striking at
her. They described him as screaming and yelling throughout the
event. In the process of their efforts to assist, one of the
citizens placed his legs in a “scissors-lock” around
McLaughlin’s chest. This witness also placed his hand on
McLaughlin’s neck at various times during the struggle in his
efforts to control McLaughlin. He described his ongoing concern
that McLaughlin would break free from the other two citizens who
were tiring in their efforts to control McLaughlin’s arms and
legs and McLaughlin would then attack him. He stated he pressed
with greater force on McLaughlin’s neck to try to control him
and protect himself. It is this conduct that explains the
injuries to McLaughlin’s neck. As a result of the efforts to
intervene and rescue Mrs. McLaughlin, one of the citizens
stated, “The man was very violent – my ruined shirt and bruised
knuckles and scraped body will attest to that.”
By the time the
Hospital Shared Services security personnel arrived, the three
“good-Samaritan” citizens had sufficient control of the still
struggling, flailing, and kicking McLaughlin to allow the
security personnel to handcuff him. McLaughlin continued to
struggle and kick. The security personnel were able to assist
the citizen who had McLaughlin in the “scissors-hold” to free
himself. The security personnel continued efforts to control
McLaughlin. The security personnel then lifted McLaughlin up
and began to walk him into the hospital. During this process,
McLaughlin stopped walking and went to his knees. There was a
continuation of the struggle, including McLaughlin flailing and
kicking his feet. He continued to yell and scream.
Denver police had
been called and at this point the first officer arrived.
McLaughlin was on the ground with the security personnel
attempting to control him. The officer told investigators that
McLaughlin was cussing, screaming, and using the “f” word a
lot. The officer attempted to assist by placing his nunchakas
around one of McLaughlin’s ankles to control his kicking. The
officer described McLaughlin as being very strong and “thinking
this guy is on something (Autopsy report toxicology testing
revealed the presence of cocaine.).” At about this same time,
McLaughlin stopped fighting. The officer and security personnel
determined that McLaughlin was not breathing. They called for
an ambulance. While awaiting the arrival of the ambulance, one
of the security personnel started and continued CPR on
McLaughlin. Paramedics arrived, provided medical assistance and
took McLaughlin to the emergency room for treatment. McLaughlin
died a few days later at Denver Health Medical Center.
In his autopsy
report, Dr. Henry stated it was his opinion that McLaughlin’s
“death was due to complications of anoxic encephalopathy
following cardiac arrest due to restraint asphyxia during
excited delirium.”
The three
“good-Samaritan” citizens had the most lengthy and intense
struggle with McLaughlin, followed in length and intensity by
the security personnel. The Denver police officer had
relatively minimal contact at the very end of the
confrontation. The incident was over by the time the paramedics
became involved.
Because there was
private citizen (non-police officer) involvement in this matter,
in addition to the usual statutes that apply in these cases, the
following statutes are pertinent to our review.
C.R.S. 18-1-704.
Use of physical force in defense of a person. A person is
justified in using physical force upon another person in order
to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably
believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical
force by that other person, and he may use the degree of force
which he reasonably believes to be necessary for that purpose.
C.R.S. 18-1-707.
Use of physical force in making an arrest or in preventing an
escape. (7) A private person acting on his own account is
justified in using reasonable and appropriate physical force
upon another person when and to the extent he reasonably
believes it necessary to effect an arrest, or to prevent an
escape from custody of an arrested person who has committed an
offense in his presence.
C.R.S. 16-3-201.
Arrest by a private person. A person who is not a peace officer
may arrest another person when any crime has been or is being
committed by the arrested person in the presence of the person
making the arrest.
C.R.S 16-3-203.
Preventing a crime – reimbursement. Any person who is not a
peace officer . . . who is made the defendant in any civil
action as a result of having sought to prevent a crime being
committed against any other person, and who has judgment entered
in his favor shall be entitled to all his court costs and to
reasonable attorney fees incurred in such action.
|